Poisoning not behind blast-accused's custodial death: FSL

Image
Press Trust of India Lucknow
Last Updated : Jul 10 2013 | 6:55 PM IST
The Forensic Science Laboratory here has concluded that poisoning was not the cause of death of an accused in a serial blasts case who recently died in police custody.
In its report sent to the circle officer (city) of Barabanki, where serial blasts accused Khalid Mujahid died in May, FSL has stated that no chemical poison was detected in the deceased's viscera, official sources said today.
Mujahid died while he was being taken to Lucknow after a hearing in a Faizabad court on May 18. His death sparked an uproar with allegations of conspiracy being made in certain quarters.
It was alleged that Mujahid had died due to suspected poisoning.
On May 19, an FIR was lodged by the deceased's uncle against 42 persons, including a retired top UP police officer and a senior serving cop, for allegedly being involved in a conspiracy leading to Mujahid's death even as the state government recommended a CBI inquiry into the matter.
The cases were booked under Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 302 (murder) of the IPC although the individual roles of those mentioned in the FIR was not clear, police said.
Mujahid's uncle Zaheer Alam had alleged in his complaint that his nephew was abducted by Special Task Force personnel from Madiyahon in Jaunpur district on December 16, 2007, and later arrested on the "false claim" that he had been arrested with explosives near Barabanki railway station.
He also alleged that the abduction and framing of Mujahid over serial blasts in Lucknow and the Faizabad court premises was the result of a conspiracy between several police officials.
The FIR states that after Mujahid was found to have been falsely implicated by the RD Nimesh Commission, the state government had moved an application for withdrawal of cases against him in a Barabanki court although that move was rejected on May 10.
The deceased's uncle said that the government had decided to challenge the above order in a higher court, in which case Mujahid would have been a key witness against the accused policemen.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 10 2013 | 6:55 PM IST

Next Story