Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav passed the order after the 13-year-old child told the court that she was sexually assaulted by the woman investigating officer (IO) in the case and she had lodged a complaint with the police against the officer but no action was taken.
However, police said that they will seek legal opinion in the matter and decide future course of action.
When asked if the woman cop has been suspended, he said that following the inquiry, her fate will be decided.
The court directed the SHO of Mangolpuri in outer Delhi to get the FIR registered against the woman IO, a sub inspector, through a senior officer and file a status report in the matter on April 29.
"The allegations will be examined and if they are found to be true, necessary departmental action and an FIR will be lodged. How can we suspended her when the allegations haven't been proved? However, if they are found to be untrue, we will appeal in the higher court," he said.
The child alleged that initially the woman official sexually assaulted her and later took her to a hospital where the doctors conducted her internal medical examination without her consent.
The police, which is already probing the aspect of sexual assault on the minor by her teacher, had earlier informed the court that it has also registered an FIR against the girl's father in view of the alleged confession letter which was given to the police by the school staff.
The initial incident occurred in August last year when the girl, a Class V student of a government school in Aman Vihar area of North-West Delhi, asked a question to the teacher who told her to meet him alone later.
The girl said in her complaint that the teacher allegedly molested her and when her parents came to the school next day to complain about his conduct, he threatened them and took thumb impression of the child's father on a blank paper.
Later, a case under the POCSO Act was registered by the police against the accused teacher.
The police has also lodged a case against other school teachers and the principal for not informing them about the alleged confession letter of the minor girl's father.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
