"What sets humans apart from the rest of the animal kingdom is our prodigious ability to reason. But what about human reasoning is truly a human-unique feature and what aspects are shared with our nonhuman relatives?," asked Aaron Blaisdell of the University of California, Los Angeles.
Blaisdell's research draws from long-understood ideas from Pavlov and others that when a rat (or dog or pigeon) observes one event followed by another, such as a tone followed by food, it forms an association between the events.
Blaisdell's work goes further, showing that rats reason.
"What I have shown in my research is that rats not only acquire these types of Pavlovian associations between two events, but that they can form a causal link between them as well," Blaisdell said.
The rat appears to believe that the tone causes the food, he said.
Blaisdell and colleagues have tested the extent of these causal beliefs in a range of conditions.
For example, if a rat learns that a light is a common cause of both tone and food, then when the rat hears the tone, it makes the prediction that the light must have occurred.
Rats, the researchers have found, also make rational inferences about their own actions. Take the example of the light as a common cause of both tone and food.
If researchers allow the rat to press a lever to turn on the tone, then the rat no longer expects food; the rat understands that it was the cause of the tone and not the light, thereby changing the expectation of food.
"This is similar to predicting bad weather to arrive when you observe a drop in air pressure in the reading on a barometer," Blaisdell said.
Blaisdell and colleagues have found that once rats observe two events together, it not only forms an association but also an expectation.
If researchers cover one of the lights so that the rat cannot see it and then they present the other light, the rats take actions as though the hidden light might be on.
This type of reasoning is the basis of counterfactual reasoning - the ability to maintain information about, and make hypotheses based off, absent events.
The study was presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society (CNS) conference in San Francisco.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
