Expressing concern over the declining sex ratio, the apex court, however, assured the Indian arms of the multinational cyber giants that it would not intiate any contempt proceedings against them as the idea was to make them "responsive" to the local laws and concerns.
A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and R Banumathi said in case of any doubt, the in-house expert bodies of these firms may communicate with the nodal agency appointed by the Centre for guidance and necessary action.
Section 22 of the PCPNDT Act pertains to prohibition of advertisements relating to pre-natal determination of sex and punishment for contravention.
"That apart, the in-house expert body shall on its own understanding delete anything which violates section 22 of the Act and in case there is any doubt, they can communicate with the nodal agency appointed by Union of India and thereafter they will be guided by the nodal agency," the court said.
"The whole problem is that they (search engines) do not have respect for the law of the country," the bench observed during the hearing and made it clear that search engines will have to block all such materials which, by any mean, help in sex determining of foetus and runs counter to the law.
Google India said it obeyed the court's directions.
The advocates representing the search engines contended
they had respect for the Indian law and were not violating the directions passed by the apex court.
Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that government's stand was "absolutely clear" that anything which violated section 22 of the Act and helped in determining the sex of a foetus cannot be allowed.
"Our clear objective is to save the girl child. If there are any measures to do it, we will do it and we are willing to do it," the Solicitor General told the court which fixed the matter for further hearing on April 11.
"You cannot have a preventive blockage. You can have curative blockage," he said.
However, the bench observed that if the search engines did not withdraw such advertisments even after being informed by the nodal agency, "they will invite the wrath of section 22 of the Act".
"Actually, your system should be so updated that it should automatically block such things on the websites. You should come forward with some proposals to comply with the Indian law," the bench said.
During the hearing, the bench also observed, "the sex ratio in India is quite low in many states and it is likely to affect the human race. We want Google India Pvt Ltd, Yahoo India and Microsoft Corporation (I) Pvt Ltd to be more statute responsive".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
