SC asks Maha govt to grant licenses to 8 dance bars by May 12

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 10 2016 | 7:48 PM IST
The Supreme Court today directed Maharashtra government to grant licenses to eight dance bars within two days and asked them to give an undertaking that they would not engage employees with criminal antecedents near the dance area.
"It is directed that an undertaking shall be given by appellants who have filed application that they shall not engage employees in the bar and dance area whose names have been mentioned in the affidavit given by the state.
"The undertaking shall be issued by tomorrow and the licenses shall be issued by day after tomorrow," a bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra and Shiva Kirti Singh said.
Maharashtra government had filed an affidavit in the court informing the bench that they had not granted licenses to eight dance bars as they found some of their employees with criminal antecedents.
Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, appearing for Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association, said not a single license has been issued till date.
He submitted that as FIR has been lodged against some employees of the bars, licenses were not being issued to them on the ground that they have criminal antecedents.
"Unless a person is convicted under the offence, he cannot be termed as a criminal. The licenses are being delayed on one pretext on the other," he said.
On the issue of increasing the height of railing adjacent to the dance stage, Bhushan told the bench that such deficiencies have been addressed.
During the hearing, one of the counsel said that criminal antecedents of dancers should also be looked into and conditions be imposed on them.
The court took strong note of this and said "are you trying to convey to us that they are criminals? Nobody can earn livelihood if they are convicted. We want to save the dignity of women.
"You want to take away means of their livelihood. Dignity of women has to be maintained and no obscenity of any kind would be allowed," the bench said.
(Reopen LGD23)
Earlier, the apex court had rapped Maharashtra government for not granting licenses to dance bars on account of non-compliance of some of the conditions and said it is better for women to perform than begging on the streets or doing something "unacceptable" for earning livelihood.
The bench, however, had acknowledged plea of Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand, appearing for Maharashtra, that the state has to ensure that there is no "obscenity" in dance bars and the dignity of women is protected there.
It had asked all dance bars to get antecedents of their employees checked by local police, besides installing CCTV cameras at all entry points of dance bars.
The court had also asked dance bars to adhere to conditions like there should be railings to demarcate performance area with the place where audience will sit and watch.
Simultaneously, it had ordered police not to ask the dance bar applicants to furnish NoCs from municipal bodies, health and fire departments on the grounds that these documents must have been sought when the hotel or restaurants had come into being.
Prior to this, the court had rejected certain conditions like providing live CCTV footage to police on the performances in the dance bars and asked Maharashtra government to grant licenses to owners within 10 days after they complied with modified guidelines.
The bench had granted three days to dance bar owners to comply with the modified conditions.
The court had modified conditions of separating the dance stage and audience areas by a railing and said a three-feet high railing will be put up in the front. The bench had also allowed verification of criminal antecedents of dance performers and setting up of greenrooms for them.
Among other conditions which the court allowed was putting up of non-transparent partition between restaurant and permit room area and the petitioner Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association agreed to it.
The bench also said that permit area or the stage cannot be altered without prior permission of the competent statutory authority.
The Association had objected to the condition that makes it compulsory for dance bar owners to "ensure that adequate number of CCTV cameras which will live feed continuously to police control room be installed to cover the entire premises.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 10 2016 | 7:48 PM IST

Next Story