SC for dismissal of BSF constable for assaulting senior

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 06 2018 | 8:24 PM IST

The Supreme Court has restored an order of dismissal of a Border Security Force (BSF) constable, who had assaulted his senior officer with a rifle butt, taking a stern view of the misconduct by the member of a "disciplined force".

The top court, which upheld the departmental punishment for the constable and set aside the August 2015 verdict of the Delhi High Court, referred to an earlier judgement delivered by the apex court in a similar matter in which it was held that assaulting a superior officer should attract severe penalty.

"We are in agreement with the view expressed (in the earlier verdict), more particularly in a case as the present, where the respondent (BSF constable) belonged to a disciplined force and used the butt of the rifle for injuring a superior officer very seriously," a bench of justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta said.

The top court set aside the August 2015 verdict of the Delhi High Court which had partly allowed the plea filed by the constable against the punishment of dismissal from service and reduced it to stoppage of three increments.

The apex court, in its recent order, held that the high court had been "far too liberal" in reducing the penalty.

The high court had also ordered his reinstatement after which the Centre had moved the apex court challenging the verdict.

The top court noted in its order that in February 2000, the constable had entered into a scuffle with his superior officer after which a charge sheet was issued to him.

Later, following a departmental enquiry, it was decided that he should be dismissed from service.

The bench, while referring to the serious nature of injuries sustained by the senior officer, observed that the "high court was far too liberal in reducing the penalty of dismissal to that of stoppage of three increments".

"Under the circumstances, we set aside the order passed by the high court and restore the departmental punishment of dismissal from service on the respondent (constable)," the bench said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 06 2018 | 8:24 PM IST

Next Story