Appointing Justice Sanjay Misra as new Lokayukta, the apex court bench headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi termed as "unfortunate" the inability of constitutional functionaries like the Chief Minister and the Chief Justice of the High Court to arrive at a consensual name as head of ombudsman.
"We are persuaded to hold that our order appointing Justice Virendra Singh (Retd) as Lokayukta was on the basis of the statement made on behalf of the state of Uttar Pradesh which now appears to be somewhat inaccurate.
"It is unfortunate that constitutional/statutory functionaries, in spite of prolonged and extended meetings, continued to have serious differences on a relatively simple issue i.E. Appointment of the Lokayukta," the bench, also comprising Justice P C Panta, said.
The bench picked out Justice Misra for the post as his name figured in the list of probables prepared by the Chief Minister and the Chief Justice of the High Court.
The court, in its order, also observed that the
reservation of the High Court Chief Justice on the name of Justice Singh with regard to his suitability for the post of Lokayukta was not brought before it when the last order was passed.
"However, we now have on record the subsequent reservation of the Chief Justice of the High Court with regard to the suitability of Justice Virendra Singh (Retd) as Lokayukta as expressed in the Chief Justice's letter dated 16th December, 2015 to His Excellency the Governor of Uttar Pradesh.
Disposing of various pleas on the issue, it asked the authorities to pass within a week the "consequential orders" in terms of its direction appointing Justice Misra as new Lokayukta. It also asked the state to file "compliance report".
The order came on pleas seeking quashing of Governor's notification, passed in pursuance of the verdict the apex court, to appoint Justice Singh as the new Lokayukta.
However, the appointment was later stayed by the apex court itself after it was told by a UP resident Sachidanad Gupta that the state government has played a "fraud upon the apex court" by hiding the fact that the Chief Justice had expressed his reservations to the name of Justice Singh.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
