SC rejects govt's move to remove Venugopal as CBI, ED counsel

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 09 2015 | 6:22 PM IST
Supreme Court today disapproved the government's move to remove senior advocate K K Venugopal as a counsel for CBI and Enforcement Directorate in the 2G spectrum allocation scam matter, saying he would continue assist the court on the probe which was at the fag end.
"We need you to assist us. We will tell them (Centre). We know how to tell them," a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra said when the issue of Venugopal's removal was raised.
During the brief hearing, the bench also said "we want you to continue assisting us as amicus (curiae) if not as CBI counsel."
Venugopal, who was recently conferred with the Padma Vibhushan, said he did not want to continue as a lawyer in the case and referred to the communication he had received from an Under Secretary level officer from the Revenue Department about his removal.
However, he later gave in to the insistence of the bench that it will not let him go and said he has no option but to assist.
"The CBI probe is practically over except the Aircel- Maxis case with regard to Chidambaram and all," he said.
"Since we are coming to the final stage, can you not assist us," the bench asked him and then said, "We request Shri K K Venugopal, the respected senior counsel, to continue to assist us in the matter by appearing for CBI and the Enforcement Directorate. We direct the CBI and the ED to continue instructing Venugopal."
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGO CPIL, supported the stand of the apex court and said Venugopal, who has dealt with the matter since the beginning, was required to continue, a view also shared by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy.
"I support and want Venugopal to continue," Swamy, who has filed a plea seeking further probe in the Aircel-Maxis deal relating to the alleged role of then Finance Minister P Chidambaram in giving it FIPB clearance, said.
"We also support that," the bench said and recalled the passage of an order by which the government was stopped from repatriating ED officer Rajeshwar Singh, who was in the team probing money laundering offences related to the 2G scam, to his parent cadre.
Earlier too, Venugopal had told the apex court that he will not be appearing in future for the agency.
He had made the statement before the bench headed by the CJI which mentioned a media report in this regard when the senior advocate was appearing in a different matter.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 09 2015 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story