SC stays EC's notification for by-poll in Gujarat's Talala assembly seat

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 01 2019 | 4:56 PM IST

The Supreme Court Monday stayed the Election Commission's March 10 notification declaring Gujarat's Talala assembly constituency seat as vacant and announcing the by-poll there along with the Lok Sabha elections.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi also issued notice to the poll panel on a plea by former Congress MLA B D Barad who has moved the apex court against the Gujarat High Court's March 27 verdict dismissing his plea against the EC's notification.

The high court had also dismissed Barad's challenge to the assembly Speaker's March 5 decision disqualifying him as an MLA following his conviction in a case for offence under section 379 (punishment for theft) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

On Monday, the apex court expressed displeasure as to how the EC had notified the Talala assembly seat as vacant and announced the by-poll there when Barad's conviction was stayed by a Sessions court on March 7.

"How can you (EC) declare the seat to be vacant on March 10 when his (Barad) conviction was stayed on March 7," the bench, which also comprised Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, asked the counsel appearing for the poll panel.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state, told the bench that the Sessions court's March 7 order staying Barad's conviction in the case was quashed by the high court on March 15.

Senior counsel A M Singhvi, appearing for the petitioner, told the court that the magisterial court's order convicting Barad was stayed by a Sessions court on March 7 but despite that the poll panel declared the assembly seat as vacant and announced by-polls there.

When Mehta said his disqualification by the Speaker was in accordance with the existing law, the CJI observed that "the Speaker and Governor are there not to obstruct the law but to facilitate the law".

Mehta then argued that the Sessions court's order staying his conviction was set aside by the high court.

To this, the bench said, "The high court order (setting aside the stay on conviction) came on March 15 then under what authority did the EC declare the seat to be vacant on March 10."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 01 2019 | 4:55 PM IST

Next Story