Most users find current speech recognition softwares to be frustratingly slow, and it is often inaccurate. However, the new study suggests a different reality.
"Speech recognition is something that is been promised to us for decades, but it has never worked very well," said James Landay, a professor at Stanford University in the US.
"But we were noticing that in the past two to three years, speech recognition was actually improving a lot, benefiting from big data and deep learning to train its neural networks to produce faster, more accurate results," said Landay.
"They grew up texting, so we're putting speech recognition up against people who are really good at this task," Landay said.
The subjects took turns typing or speaking about 100 phrases sourced from a standard library of everyday phrases used in text-based research - phrases such as "physics and chemistry are hard," "have a good weekend" and "go out for some pizza and beer" - while the testing app recorded their times and accuracy rates.
The results were clear no matter the language. For English, speech recognition was three times faster than typing, and the error rate was 20.4 per cent lower.
In Mandarin Chinese, speech was 2.8 times faster, with an error rate 63.4 per cent lower than typing.
"We knew speech recognition is pretty good, so we expected it to be faster, but we were actually quite surprised to find that it was almost three times faster than typing on a keyboard," said Sherry Ruan, PhD student at Stanford.
"We should put speech in more applications than just typing an email or text message," Landay said.
"You could imagine an interface where you use speech to start and then it switches to a graphical interface that you can touch and control with your finger," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
