TNGDA had yesterday announced withdrawal of their strike after the High Court took a serious view of it and hoped they would call it off and return to duty to continue their service."
A vacation bench of Justices N Kirubakaran and V Parthiban had expressed its displeasure and hoped they would call it off and return to duty to continue their service "while hearing a lawyer's plea, seeking a direction to TNGDA to roll it back.
Government doctors in Tamil Nadu had boycotted work demanding 50 per cent reservation for them in admission to post-graduate medical courses in the state.
It had said that if at all they were aggrieved, they could very well resort to the machinery provided under different statutory provisions to redress their grievances.
The issue came to the fore after a single judge on April 17 ruled that incentive marks to in-service candidates in PG admissions would have to be based on Medical Council of India (MCI) regulation and not as per state government prospectus.
As per MCI rules, 50 per cent of the medical seats should be allocated to all-India quota while the rest can be retained by the state. Of this, 25 per cent of seats should be for the in-service candidates.
The government had submitted that award of the incentive marks to in-service candidates was being made for the past 35 years to encourage doctors to serve people in remote, hilly and difficult areas and was not violative of the MCI norms.
The bench asked TNGDA's counsel if there was any proposal to revive the strike after the judgement (referring to the PG Courses admission which has been referred to a third Judge).
It then questioned the Special Government Pleader about the decision of other doctors' associations to the strike.
"If they have not withdrawn the strike, what is the action you are going to take?" it asked, to which the SGP said they were sincerely trying to settle the issue amicably.
"This court hopes that patient treatment will be taken care of by the doctors without any problem in future.As far as the doctors who are not reporting to duty, it is for the state to take action against them in accordance with law.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
