The Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry, chaired by K C Tyagi, expressed concern over the fact that a project which has already seen three extensions is looking for further extension.
"In the view of the committee, this unending continuation of the flagship project of DHI, which was originally intended to be time-bound, is a pointer to mismanagement along with lack of oversight and accordingly recommends that a performance audit of NATRiP with specific focus on lapses in project management shall be conducted," the panel noted in the report which was tabled in Parliament today.
NATRIP which plans creation of facilities at seven locations such as Ahmednagar, Silchar, Raebareli, Pune, Manesar, Chennai and Indore had faced hurdles at various stages of implementation on account of delays in acquisition of land, clearances and shifting of utilities besides, contractual complications and foreign exchange variation.
Further, the committee said it would have found it more appropriate if the government would have atleast by now decided the manner in which funds to NATRiP are to be provided, either as loan or as grants.
The committee also noted the explanation given by the DHI on how it is to utilise the plan loan of Rs 300 crore allocated to the project during 2015-16 over a period of three years ending 2017-18.
"In this regard the committee recognises that this spread of expenditure warrants yet another extension of NATRiP beyond currently extendable period up to December 2017," it said.
Terming the FAME-India scheme as one of the most forward looking schemes of the government in the face of heightened environmental concerns and depleting fossil fuel reserves, the panel pointed out complaints of shortage of funds.
The committee would want the department to submit the reasons for the said shortages and the curative action plan, it added.
Further, the panel while examining demands of Department
of Heavy Industries felt that there was a need for more impetus on R&D, specifically related to the development of original technology in the field of electrical vehicles.
The committee asked the auto industry to start looking for export markets in the face of saturating, domestic arena while formulating business expansion plans.
"Also they should earnestly try and develop indigenous technology in the field of electric vehicles," the panel said.
Calling the creation of different heads for allocation and expenditure of funds under a single umbrella scheme ironical, the panel said it is against the government vision of simplification of procedures.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
