UP Lokyukta's appointment on hold as SC queries UP govt

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi/Lucknow
Last Updated : Dec 19 2015 | 9:02 PM IST
The appointment of former judge of Allahabad High Court Justice Virendra Singh as Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta was today put on hold after the Supreme Court held a special sitting on a holiday and posed embarrassing questions to SP government, which was accused of concealing facts and "playing fraud".
Hearing a fresh petition challenging the appointment, a bench comprising justices A K Goel and U U Lalit asked Uttar Pradesh government as to how the name of Justice Singh was placed before the bench concerned, which decided on Singh's appointment, when the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court, Justice D Y Chandrachud, had specifically made some objections to his name.
UP's Advocate General (AAG) Gaurav Bhatia gave an undertaking in court that the Lokayukta's swearing-in ceremony will not be held tomorrow and the state government would wait for the outcome of the fresh petition on the issue and respond to averments made in it when the court would hear the matter on January 4.
Later in the evening, Uttar Pradesh Governor Ram Naik deferred the oath taking of the new Lokayukta.
State Chief Secretary Alok Ranjan had sought the Governor's approval for keeping the swearing in abeyance, a Raj Bhawan release said in Lucknow.
In an unusual order, apex court had, on December 16, exercised its constitutional power and appointed Justice Singh as Lokayukta by recording failures of the panel, comprising the Chief Minister, the leader of Opposition and the HC Chief Justice, in selecting the chief of ombudsman despite orders.
The bench today took note of the fresh petition filed by UP resident Sachidanand Gupta that immediately after the appointment, the Chief Justice of the High Court had written a letter to Governor Ram Naik expressing his displeasure against the state government for not disclosing the true facts that he had some reservations on Singh's name.
After hearing submissions of advocate Kamini Jaiswal, the bench put some searching questions to AAG Gaurav Bhatia asking that why there has been no denial of stated position taken by the Chief Justice and widely reported in the media.
Bhatia was given an opportunity to seek instruction and respond to the queries of the Bench which re-assembled after a break of ten minutes. The AAG then gave the undertaking.
The fresh plea said, "The state government has violated
the essential condition of rule of law, by neither apprising this court of the correct facts and also not approaching this court to apprise it of the true facts even after the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court had expressed that the name of Justice (Retd.) Virendra Singh/Respondent No.3 had been dropped by the Chief Minister himself.
"The so called 'communication gap' between the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court and the Chief Minister about which there is no mention before this court during the hearing on 16.12.2015 is destructive of the fundamental conditions upon which the Constitution of India rests - i.E. Rule of law, truth and constitutional morality."
The tenure of UP Lokayukta is at least eight years and once the High Court Chief Justice has apprised Principal Secretary of the Governor and the state's Chief Secretary that the name of Justice Singh was "not even in fray and was not in consideration", it was obligatory on authorities to "approach this court and apprise this court regarding the same; rather than to advise the Governor of UP to issue a formal order of appointment of Justice Singh as Lokayukta," it said.
Earlier, the apex court had examined a list of nominees and ordered the appointment of Justice Singh as Lokayukta.
"The failure of constitutional functionaries to comply with the orders of the highest court of the land is deeply regretted and astonishing...We, therefore, proceed to exercise our right under Article 142 of the Constitution to remedy the situation by passing an appropriate order," it had said.
The bench had regretted that its several orders have not been "heeded" by the constitutional functionaries -- the chief minister, the leader of opposition and the chief justice of the Allahabad high court.
On December 14, the apex court had rapped the UP government for not appointing Lokayukta in the state despite its directions and had asked them appoint by December 16.
The bench was hearing the pleas filed by Gupta, Mahendra Kumar Jain and lawyer Shiv Kumar Tripathi seeking a direction to the state to appoint the Lokayukta at the earliest in pursuance of the Supreme Court orders.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 19 2015 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story