Update father about son gone missing in Malaysia: HC to govt

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 14 2017 | 12:42 PM IST
Desperate attempts of a father, searching for his son who had gone missing in 2011 off the Malaysian coast while on-board a vessel, has led him to move the Delhi High Court.
The court has now asked the government to update him either about his son's whereabouts or his fate. His son had gone missing barely two months after he had started working on a ship of a Malaysian shipping company.
"He (father) needs closure," a bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Deepa Sharma told the Centre while seeking its response on the man's plea.
The court directed the Ministries of External Affairs, Shipping and Overseas Indian Affairs to place on record the steps taken by them to trace the missing son of the Haryana resident and listed the matter for hearing on July 14.
It also asked the government about the status of the FIR lodged by the company with the Malaysian police after the petitioner's son, Mukesh Kumar, disappeared.
As per the company, Kumar had disappeared on December 24, 2011, and while searching the ship for him, they had found his slippers, gloves and cigarettes floating in the water, but his body was not found.
The petitioner, Kheta Ram, has pleaded that he wants to know what had happened to his son and whether any effort was made to locate him since 2011.
"On a ship with so many crew and people in the middle of the sea, where can Mukesh go missing is the question no one could satisfactorily answer," the plea filed through advocate Rabin Majumder said.
Kumar had been employed as an ordinary seaman with the Malaysian company in October 2011. The petitioner has contended that the company had "smoothly washed-off its hands" from all responsibilities after lodging an FIR and then offering Malaysian Ringgit (RM) 25,000 as final settlement amount.
The petitioner had requested the company for an interim compensation of RM 175,000.
The company had told him that under the Malaysian insurance law, claims can only be considered if the body or the person was unfound after five years.
In his plea, Kheta Ram has also sought directions to the Malaysian company, Shri Cahaya Services Sdn Bhd, to compensate him and his family.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 14 2017 | 12:42 PM IST

Next Story