Uproar in Maha assembly over Aney's demand for separate

Maharashtra Advocate General Shreehari Aney's demand for separate Marathwada state today led to ruckus in the state Assembly which was adjourned thrice as Congress-NCP and Shiv Sena raised slogans and demanded Aney's resignation.
"The government should sack Aney or else it will be construed that it is backing him," NCP MLA Dilip Walse Patil said.
Calling Aney "Owaisi in Maharashtra", Shiv Sena MLA Pratap Sarnaik said, "What Aney is saying tantamounts to insult of martyrs who laid down their lives in the struggle for united Maharashtra."
The House was adjourned thrice amid noisy scenes and sloganeering.
Aney, at an event in Jalna yesterday where he disbursed relief to families of farmers who committed suicide, said Marathwada bore more injustice than Vidarbha and should therefore be independent.

He also called people of Marathwada to start a movement for formation of a separate state.

Speaking outside the Assembly, State Congress spokesperson Sachin Sawant said "Is Aney an agent for dividing the state?"
Congress MLA Nitesh Rane also strongly condemned Aney's remarks.
Amidst the uproar, an Opposition member sought to know if the government will invoke 'sedition' charge against the Advocate General.
State Revenue Minister Eknath Khadse, while speaking in the Upper House, said the government is ready for a debate over the issue and that a decision on Aney's statement would be taken within an hour's time.
Panel Chairman Muzaffar Hussain, however, chose to adjourn the House for the day.

Leader of Opposition Dhananjay Munde, who had initially moved the adjournment motion, called for an immediate clarification by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis over the issue and demanded Aney's ouster.
"Even the last time we demanded his resignation, but
the CM supported him and today he got the courage to go a step further. He has to be removed from his post immediately and the CM should make the government's stand clear," Munde said.
Earlier, Lok Bharati's Kapil Patil, while speaking on Motion 289, said Aney's statement amounts to treason.
"Aney has time and again spoken against the government. His statements amount to treason. We want to know if the government will invoke section 124 (A) of the IPC against him," Patil said.

When the controversy over Aney's separate Vidarbha remarks erupted last year, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis had indicated that there was no need for Aney's resignation for his statement on Vidarbha, while stating that the subject of creating a separate state of Vidarbha falls solely in the jurisdiction of the Parliament and union government.
The Shiv Sena had staged demonstrations and demanded Aney's resignation for his statement on a need for referendum to create a separate Vidarbha state.
Fadnavis had said Aney made it clear that he had expressed his views in a private function and not as the Advocate General of the state.

Aney had also said that while some people argue that the separate Vidarbha demand was made by a few leaders and does not enjoy popular public support, the fact was that 97 per cent people in four districts of Vidarbha had voted in favour of a separate Vidarbha.
He further said that if at all there were any doubts, the Centre could go for a referendum.
(Reopens BOM 5)
Following a ruckus, the House was adjourned for 35
minutes.
When the House reassembled, Revenue Minister Eknath Khadse made a statement to clarify the government's stand on Aney's remarks and said, "What Aney said is not view of the state government. The state government does not agree with his view.

"Please let the House function as usual. You are creating chaos for political gains. Don't you want to discuss drought and issues concerning people?"
"The issue of separate statehood is not under consideration of the state government now. We will take appropriate action (on Aney's remarks). Discussion has been held with the CM," he said.
After Khadse's statement, the House was adjourned for the day.