HUL plans for legal options against GST anti-profiteering authority order

The company claimed that it has always maintained that GST is a progressive reform which will benefit consumers and the industry at large

HUL
HUL
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 26 2018 | 10:21 PM IST

FMCG major Hindustan Unilever (HUL) Wednesday said it is considering "legal options" after GST anti-profiteering authority found it guilty of not passing on rate cut benefits to consumers.

The National Anti Profiteering Authority (NAA) has passed an order against the company on December 24, 2018 for depositing an amount of Rs 2.23 billion, HUL said in a regulatory filing.

Making its stand clear on the matter, the company said: "The NAA order refers to the need to pass on the benefit of reduction in rates to consumers which is fully consistent with HUL's stand and actions.

"However, it makes a narrow interpretation of the law and does not take into account well established industry practice backed by law."

Also, it said,"no methodology has been determined by NAA as required under law to determine if benefit has been passed or not. Given there is divergence on some basic issues, HUL will, consider legal options available to it."

The company claimed that it has always maintained that GST is a progressive reform which will benefit consumers and the industry at large.

"In the absence of set rules and guidelines on profiteering, HUL has gone by the spirit of the law, and passed on the entire benefit received under GST to consumers - either through reduction in prices or through increase in grammage," it said in the filing. 
 

HUL further said it kept the government informed of the approach and the manner that it had adopted in passing on the GST benefits to consumers.

The NAA had stated that although the Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate on a large number of products was cut from 28 per cent to 18 per cent, HUL had not reduced the maximum retail price (MRP) of its products.

The authority had found the company guilty of not passing on rate cut benefits of Rs 3.83 billion to consumers.

"Since the respondent (HUL) has already deposited an amount of Rs 1.60 billion in the Central CWF (consumer welfare fund), he is hereby directed to deposit an amount of Rs 314.5 million in the central CWF and the balance amount of Rs 1.91 billion in CWFs of the states," the NAA had said.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 26 2018 | 7:35 PM IST

Next Story