Additional Sessions Judge Ashutosh Kumar said that prima facie the woman knew about her pregnancy before her marriage and she had not disclosed this fact to her husband before tying the knot and deceived him.
"The said acts of the respondent no. 1 (woman) had caused damage and harm or same is likely to cause harm to the husband in body, mind and reputation.
"Consequently, the acts of the woman clearly fall under the definition of cheating....," it said.
The sessions court summoned the woman to appear before the magistrate for these offences and set aside the order of the trial court which had dismissed the complaint of the man, a resident of Najafgarh here.
"It is clear that the trial court had not correctly appreciated the material on record and had not correctly interpreted the statement of revisionist (man).
The man had filed a complaint seeking prosecution of his wife and her parents for allegedly conspiring to cheat him and causing miscarriage of the woman.
He alleged that she admitted that she was having an affair with someone else prior to their marriage.
He said he got married to the woman in April 2012 and he was not allowed to talk or meet her before marriage.
When they went for honeymoon, the woman was vomiting there but refused to consult any doctor and on returning, she went to her parents house, the man said.
