Work out plan for removal of 'Seemai Karuvelam' trees: HC to

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 28 2017 | 8:42 PM IST
In an interim order, the Madras High Court today directed the Tamil Nadu government to work out a plan for removal of 'Seemai Karuvelam' (Prosopis Juliflora) trees from water bodies in a phased manner.
The direction was given by a bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee, Justice MM Sundresh and Justice M Sundar on a PIL filed by A Meganathan, an advocate, seeking to forebear authorities from drastically removing 'Seemai Karuvalam' trees without any scientific proof on their negative aspects.
The First Bench had referred the matter to a larger bench and stayed felling of the trees until further orders on April 28.
On May 11, the state government had informed the court that a committee headed by Chief Conservator of Forest (Research) as chairman was appointed to go into various aspects of the negative and positive impacts of the trees.
Government Pleader M K Subramaniam today submitted the panel's analysis report to the larger bench.
After going through the report, the bench in its order said, "As per the recommendation of the committee a plan may be worked out and implemented for removal of 'Karuvelam' trees across water bodies in the state in a phased manner."
The authorities with the help of the committee and other experts can identify areas where removal process should be mechanical and where it should be manual and appropriate land management standards shall also be designed to control the spread of the trees, the judges said.
A programme should also be evolved for planting alternative species on the land cleared of 'Karuvelam' trees.
The expert committee, in its report, said "the committee reviewed in an exhaustive manner available scientific literature and analysed the facts and is of the opinion that total removal of Prosopsis Juliflora is not necessary."
The committee said removal of the trees may be initiated to facilitate flow of water to augment the storage capacity of water bodies.
Referring to southern districts of Tamil Nadu such as Virudhunagar, Pudukottai, Ramanathapuram, Tirunelveli, Thoothukodi and other areas where the tree is dominant, the panel in the report said, "the native soil does not support much plant diversity, the total removal of Juliflora is not recommended."
The larger bench, which passed the interim order on the basis of the report, directed the state to file an action taken report within eight weeks and posted the matter for October 13.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 28 2017 | 8:42 PM IST

Next Story