Additional sessions judge Virender Bhat discharged the Uttar Pradesh resident of the charges against him saying, "If he had committed robbery upon her, she would not have solemnised marriage with him after his release from jail."
"In her deposition before the court, she did not mention anything about rape. In the cross examination conducted by the additional public prosecutor, she denied that she had been raped by the accused," the court said, adding that the girl's parents have also not mentioned anything about rape and snatching of her chain, earrings and mobile phone.
They told the police that after their daughter had refused to talk to him, the accused had hit her with a brick and looted her belongings.
They had also alleged that their daughter was raped when she became unconscious.
"What emerges from the deposition of the two witnesses (girl's parents) is that the accused (youth) was in deep love with the prosecutrix and intended to marry her. Therefore, I find it unbelievable that the youth would rob the girl with whom he wants to marry.
"If, in fact, the accused had committed robbery upon her, she would not have solemnised marriage with him after his release from jail," the court said.
