A looming threat to the consolidation process is the likely recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission, which would come into effect from January 2016. Precedent suggests a hit of full one per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) to government finances. This should be warded off by combining meaningful pay increases with significant rationalisation across categories, though it may be politically unpalatable. A second imperative is to enhance resources allocated to infrastructure. Former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's emphasis on highways could well be matched by Mr Modi's priority on railways, a national backbone that has been tragically depleted. A short-term source of funds for this could be an investment surcharge on rail fares; clearly, a decade of static fares has hugely reduced them in real terms and there should be little political resistance to a partial correction, particularly if it is visibly going into improving the system. Another urgent challenge is to revamp the state of the defence system. That Mr Jaitley has been asked to head the defence and finance ministries simultaneously is a rare opportunity to rationalise the system itself while finding the resources to modernise it. There is promising talk of private, including foreign, investment in defence equipment. Given the increasing technology intensity of everything defence-related, even food supplies, it is high time that the public monopoly in this domain was done away with.
On the tax front, even as the goods and services tax (GST) is being put through the constitutional amendment process, the Budget can get the process started by introducing a single-rate framework, just as a GST would have done. This will send a strong signal of commitment to that very important reform. Mr Jaitley should also begin talking about compensation to states as an inducement to get them to make the final push. Properly managed, the GST could become a reality in 2015-16, which would be a huge feather in this government's cap. A politically attractive personal tax measure would be to index the income tax threshold level to, for example, consumer inflation. The revenue loss can be mitigated by a small increase in the tax rate on incomes above, say, the ~50 lakh level. A reasonable long-term capital gains tax could also be considered. Finally, for so many years, the direct tax framework has incentivised capital intensity of production. It is time labour-intensive production was incentivised, perhaps through an employment tax credit.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
