SAT upholds Sebi order against REI Agro promoters, 7 others

This for a case related to fraudulent trading in shares of the company in 2004-05

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 19 2013 | 2:48 PM IST
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) today upheld Sebi's order against REI Agro promoters and seven other entities in a case related to fraudulent trading in shares of the company during 2004-2005.
 
REI Agro promoters -- Kaushalaya Devi Jhunjhunwala, Sangita Jhunjhunwala and Suruchi Jhunjhunwala -- along with other connected entities were found by a Sebi probe to have indulged in synchronised trades that created artificial volume and also influenced the company's share price.
 
Accordingly, in an order passed in December, last year, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had imposed a total penalty of Rs 1.38 crore on the company promoters and seven other entities.
 
Pursuant to the order, the promoters and other entities had approached SAT appealing against the market regulator's ruling in the case.
 
In its order today, SAT said: "...Decision of (Sebi's) adjudicating officer that appellants in connivance with each other have resorted to artificial trade in illiquid REI Agro scrip to facilitate promoters of REI Agro to sell shares of REI Agro through stock exchanges cannot be faulted".
 
SAT noted that the entities "had acted in concert with common design of manipulating volume of trades in REI Agro scrip" and "to facilitate offloading of the company's shares by promoters".
 
"Consequently, penalty imposed upon appellants...Cannot be faulted," it added.
 
The case relates to Sebi's probe into the alleged irregularity in the trading in the shares of REI Agro from August 9, 2004 to September 16, 2005 wherein the firm's shares had witnessed wide fluctuations in price and volume at BSE and NSE.
 
Based on its probe, Sebi had imposed a fine of Rs 10 lakh each on three promoters of REI Agro.
 
Seven entities -- Harrington Commercial, Raksha Financiers, Hawks Financiers, Pingle Marketing, Sangita Securities, Rajkamal Marketing and Hi-Fi Tradecom (now known as Octal Suppliers) -- were slapped with Rs 15 lakh each.
 
Hi-Fi Tradecom was imposed with an additional penalty of three lakhs for failing to comply with regulator's summons.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 19 2013 | 2:45 PM IST

Next Story