SC notice to BSNL on Andhra govt's plea on sale tax payment

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 12:09 AM IST

The Supreme Court has issued notice to Bharat Snachar Nigam (BSNL) on an Andhra Pradesh government plea alleging that the state-run firm was liable to pay sales tax of more than Rs 469 crore on telephone rentals and airtime charges.     

A bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia sought reply from the state-owned telecom service provider as to why it should also be granted refund of around Rs 14.52 crore.     

It further asked BSNL to reply on the issue whether the state had the power to adjust and withhold refunds under Section 33C of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.     

The Andhra Pradesh High Court on July 24 had held that the tax authorities had wrongly withheld the refund amount of Rs 14.52 crore and the same along with interest should be paid to BSNL within four weeks, failing which the amount would be recovered from the officer responsible for causing delay.     

Challenging the High Court verdict, the state government submitted that it had the power to withhold refund in certain cases, where an order on giving refund to an assessee or licensee was a matter of an appeal.     

Senior counsel Rakesh Dwivedi and Rajneesh Kumar Singh, appearing for the state, said that BSNL was liable to pay more than Rs 469 crore between 1997 to 2008 and that granting of refund would definitely affect the state's revenue adversely.

According to the state government, huge amount of taxes were due from the service provider and it had failed to clear the arrears.     

It submitted that the assessing authority had withheld refund of more than 14.52 crore as the grant of refund would adversely affect revenue.      

It added that telephone rentals were goods and thus liable to sales tax.    

The state government further contended that of the APVAT Commissioner has the power to withhold refund to companies when its comes under litigation and the high court ignored this basic fact.     

The issue had reached the courts after the department had raised a tax demand of around Rs 42.87 crore on BSNL in August 2003. The PSU had moved the high court challenging the demand order.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 30 2009 | 5:30 PM IST

Next Story