According to official data, fire accidents claim merely 2 per cent of total lives lost. But from two accidents in 2010-11, the number rose to four in 2011-12 and further multiplied to eight in 2012-13. Saturday’s accident occurred near Kothacheru railway station in Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh when the fire broke out in the AC III tier coach-B1.
| BURNING TRAIN |
Source: Indian Railways |
It is not that the Railways is not aware about the steps that could prevent such a disaster. A high level safety review committee, headed by Anil Kakodkar, had recommended in February 2012 that flame detection systems be put in coaches. It asked for improving safety standards concerning fire accidents. The current ‘dry chemical powder’ type portable fire extinguishers were insufficient in controlling fire. Also, the experiments with fire alarms based on smoke detection in moving coaches have not been a success. However, most of the recommendations are yet to be implemented. In fact, funds have been lying unutilised. The Comptroller and Auditor General, in a recent report said the railway safety fund has been under-utilised for the past few years. In 2011-12, about Rs 670 crore lay in the fund.
Though the exact cause of the accident would only be known after the fact-finding committee under the Railway Commissioner of Safety submits its report, an official said there were increasing instances of power overloading in trains these days.
The Kakodkar committee report notes that unlike aviation safety standards, where in case of emergency landing and take-off, the evacuation time of all passengers must be designed and demonstrated within 90 seconds, the Railways has no such standard. Besides, passengers cannot jump out of emergency windows without any aid in the event of some accident to their train.
The committee noted that the absence of an independent safety regulator by an independent agency separate from operations is a cause of worry. It argued that there is an inherent conflict of interest as the Railway Board has the ‘unique distinction of being the rule maker, operator and the regulator, all wrapped into one.’ It was observed that the Commissioners of Railway Safety, which work under the ministry of aviation, have a negligible role at the operational level.
The committee had recommended setting up a statutory Railway Safety Authority. It also ‘strongly advised’ to stop the introduction of new trains without adequate inputs to the existing infrastructure.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
