In a new turn in the family's legal battle, the Delhi High Court has recently granted an interim injunction asking Sona Mandhira Pvt. Ltd. to refrain from using Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd. (Sona BLW)'s registered trademark "SONA" in any manner or any other trademark/trade name/logo containing "SONA".
Sona BLW has filed a suit against the use of its trademark by Sona Mandhira with respect to similar/ancillary services and goods, such as automobile parts etc. contending such use to be unauthorised, illegal and a malafide adoption.
A single-judge bench of Justice Navin Chawla observed: "The balance of convenience is also in favour of plaintiffs Sona BLW Precision Forging Ltds and against the defendants Sona Mandhira. The plaintiffs are likely to suffer grave irreparable harm if the defendants are not restrained from using the word 'Sona' as part of the corporate name and/or as a trademark during the pendency of the present suit."
However, Sona Mandhira had submitted in court that the word 'Sona' is a generic and common word in trade and has attained the status of publici juris. It is not an invented word, but a generic word.
It also submitted that various companies have been registered in the Office of the Registrar of Companies using the word "Sona" as part of their corporate name and no person can claim exclusive proprietary rights over the word "Sona".
Sona Mandhira contended that the present case was essentially a family dispute between Sunjay Kapur i.e. Chairman of the Sona BLW, Mandira Koirala, sister of Sunjay Kapur and Rani Kapur, mother of Sunjay Kapur.
The legal battle between siblings Mandira and Sunjay, children of the late Surinder Kapur, has just begun and could potentially be lengthy. As per a source close to the Kapur family, Sunjay is trying to prevent his sister's rapidly growing company from using the brand name.
Surprisingly, Sunjay claims to have exclusive rights to the brand name 'Sona', which his father founded, even though he sold the family's complete share to the private equity firm, Blackstone.
In the court, Sona BLW was represented by senior advocates Akhil Sibal and Rajshekhar Rao.
Sona Mandhira was represented by senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Dayan Krishnan.
--IANS
spr/pgh
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)