The Gujarat high court’s intervention at the instance of the GSPC was wrong, the judgment said, while setting aside the high court judgment in favour of GSPC.
GAIL had entered into a long-term contract for 15 years in 2004 with GSPC to provide natural gas till 2019. The price renewal for the gas was to be provided from January 1, 2014 onwards . Disputes broke out two years ago over pricing and the GSPC moved the high court which quashed the termination of contract by Gail.
The Supreme Court judgment said: “The contents of the sales agreement, the Price Side Letters and the correspondence exchanged between Gail and GSPC give a clue of the complex nature of the price fixation mechanism. Therefore, the High Court should have relegated GSPC to the remedy of arbitration and the Arbitral Tribunal could have decided complicated dispute between the parties by availing the services of experts.”
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)