Regular shortfall in govt share in employee pension scheme: CAG

EPFO had demanded Rs 1,805.07 crore. However, the govt paid Rs 1,340 crore only

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 19 2014 | 6:48 PM IST
There were consistent shortfalls in government's contribution between 2006-07 and 2011-12 towards pension schemes run by retirement fund body EPFO, official auditor CAG has said while asking it make the payment in time.

"There were consistent shortfalls in receipts of contributions from the central government as against claims preferred during 2006-07 to 2011-12. Central government should remit its contribution to EPFO in time," the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) said in its report for 2011-12 tabled in Parliament this week.

At present, the central government contributes 1.16% of workers' basic wages, including basic pay and dearness allowance, towards Employees' Pension Scheme 1995 (EPS-95) run by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO).

Under the scheme, employers contribute 8.33% of the basic wages towards the EPS-95. Thus, every month 9.49% of the basic wages of a worker is contributed to his pension account.

According to the CAG report, in 2006-07 EPFO demanded Rs 1,805.07 crore-- Rs 870.57 crore as arrears of government's share and Rs 934.50 crore as government's contribution due for the fiscal.

However, the government paid Rs 1,340 crore only leaving a shortfall of Rs 465.07 crore or 25.76% of what claimed by the EPFO.

As per the data in the report, the shortfall in government's contribution kept rising till 2011-12. The shortfall rose to 1,943.99 crore in 2011-12 or 59.02% of the demand made by the EPFO.

The EPFO had claimed Rs 3,293.99 crore in 2011-12 from government as its contribution towards the EPS-95,-- Rs 1,425.53 crore as arrears and Rs 1,868.46 crore as the amount due for the fiscal. But government paid Rs 1,350 crore only.

However in its reply to the CAG on the issue, the EPFO said, "Delay in contribution made by central government has no immediate adverse effect on pension obligations."

But the CAG held "the reply of EPFO regarding adverse effect is not acceptable as shortfall in receipts of contributions affected the EPS corpus including investments and interest thereon".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 19 2014 | 6:44 PM IST

Next Story