At least two congressional committees are planning hearings after Apple's refusal to help the FBI unlock a phone used by a terrorist.
The House Judiciary Committee asked officials from Apple to testify at a March 1 hearing, according to people familiar with the planning. And the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent letters Friday to Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, and FBI Director James Comey, asking them to testify. A date wasn't specified.
The hearings follow Apple's refusal to comply with a court order obtained Tuesday by the FBI that requires the company to help unlock an iPhone used by the gunman in the December massacre in San Bernardino, California. Apple hasn't responded to the congressional invitations.
Lawmakers on the Judiciary committee are divided over Apple's stance, reflecting a lack of consensus that has thwarted congressional efforts in recent years to strike a balance between privacy rights and law enforcement.
"Allowing the government to mandate that Apple undermine its encryption technology to create a backdoor for government agents is unlawful, unwise and unsafe," said Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican.
The House Judiciary Committee asked officials from Apple to testify at a March 1 hearing, according to people familiar with the planning. And the House Energy and Commerce Committee sent letters Friday to Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, and FBI Director James Comey, asking them to testify. A date wasn't specified.
Read more from our special coverage on "APPLE"
- Apple,US escalate the battle over San Bernardino shooters iPhone
- Facebook, Twitter back Apple over cracking shooters iPhone
- Apple gains Silicon Valleys backing in fight against government
- Apple CEOs face-off with FBI reveals a tech industry raring to fight back
- Apple launches payments service Apple Pay in China
The hearings follow Apple's refusal to comply with a court order obtained Tuesday by the FBI that requires the company to help unlock an iPhone used by the gunman in the December massacre in San Bernardino, California. Apple hasn't responded to the congressional invitations.
Lawmakers on the Judiciary committee are divided over Apple's stance, reflecting a lack of consensus that has thwarted congressional efforts in recent years to strike a balance between privacy rights and law enforcement.
"Allowing the government to mandate that Apple undermine its encryption technology to create a backdoor for government agents is unlawful, unwise and unsafe," said Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
SAVE 25%
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Subscribe
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors
Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share
Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor
Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements
Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
SAVE 25%