K M Natraj, Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the ED and CBI in the Aircel-Maxis case, on Monday asserted that P Chidambaram, as finance minister, had granted approval beyond his capacity and benefited certain people and received kickbacks.
"These are serious economic offences which are a serious threat to the national economy and are white-collar crimes. As finance minister, he granted approval beyond his capacity, benefitted certain persons and received kickbacks," he told special CBI judge O P Saini.
O P Saini was hearing the petition filed by P Chidambaram and his son Karti Chidambaram seeking anticipatory bail in the case. The court reserved orders on the plea till September 5.
Natraj opposed the bail plea moved by the accused on the ground that they might tamper with and destroy the evidence.
"There has been non-cooperation by both the accused in the matter. They did not strategically cooperate in the investigation. Non-cooperation is another aspect which has to be borne in mind while deciding on their application," he contended.
Natraj said that some transactions made through several shell companies and accounts in Singapore and the United Kingdom (UK) have also been detected.
The counsel said that Letters Rogatory (LR) have been sent to different countries to seek information.
"We have collected strong evidence and materials to make out a case under Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) and under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)," Natraj told the court seeking their custody for detailed investigation.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Chidambaram in the court, however, opposed the contentions put forth by the counsel and said that an attempt is being made to prejudice, humiliate and create camouflage to deny interim protection to his clients.
When CBI, in the Prevention of Corruption (PC) case, has not called Karti for questioning since Dec 6, 2014, where did the question of something 'earth-shattering' arise, Singhvi asked. He argued that the accused would not fail the "triple test" of flight risk, non-cooperation and tampering with evidence.
The case, which is being probed by the CBI and ED, relates to alleged irregularities in grant of Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approval in the Aircel-Maxis deal.
The FIPB approval was allegedly granted in 2006 when Chidambaram was the Union finance minister.
According to rules and foreign direct investment (FDI) policy of the Central government, Chidambaram was only empowered to give approval to proposals involving foreign investment up to Rs 600 crore.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
