Demand to reduce indirect taxes not practical: Jaitley

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 08 2016 | 8:32 PM IST

The demand for reducing the indirect taxes and hiking direct taxes is not practical, Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said in the Lok Sabha on Monday.

"There is a demand that the rate of indirect taxes should be low as these are regressive taxes and that the direct taxes should be increased. In this regard, a comparison with other countries is not possible because the number of taxpayers in these countries is much higher," Jaitley said while replying to a debate on the Goods and Services Tax Bill in the lower house.

"A lot of people are exempt from paying income tax in India for economic and social reasons," he said.

The minister said corporate tax in India was kept "competitive" on purpose, in comparison with other countries.

"The corporate tax is low so that businesses have more money with them to invest back into the country. If we hike the corporate tax to, say 50 per cent, the corporates may choose to invest in countries where the tax rate is, say 20 per cent," he said.

Earlier, Jaitley hit out at the Congress, saying the 18 per cent cap on GST was suggested by the party when the bill was passed in the Lok Sabha and later tabled in the Rajya Sabha.

"The concept of a cap on GST was a subsequent development. The cap was not discussed in 2006 and in the successive years. Even when the Congress left (was voted out of power at the Centre) in 2014, nowhere was the cap suggestion made.

"The suggestion on the cap was adopted by the Congress after 2015, when the bill went to the Rajya Sabha," he said.

Leader of the Congress in the Lok Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge took a dig at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying he had opposed the bill as Gujarat Chief Minister by calling it "retrograde in nature".

"We were the creators of the GST. We were the first to bring the GST. We support it. Those who are passing the GST now, why were they opposing it when they were in the opposition?" asked Kharge.

"Had they agreed to our conditions on the GST earlier, the delay wouldn't have happened. We were never against the GST. We always wanted to pass it. It is wrong to say that we blocked the GST Bill," he added.

--IANS

mak/tsb/vm

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 08 2016 | 8:20 PM IST

Next Story