What has added to the investor sentiment is the forecast that the world output of sugar will be three-four per cent lower in the year ahead. In India too, the Indian Sugar Mills Association has scaled down its projected production for the coming year from 28 million tonnes to 27 million tonnes, largely on account of deficient rainfall in Karnataka and Maharashtra (the largest sugar-producing state in the country). Other factors too are at work. One, the Union government has allowed sugar exports of four million tonnes, which should reduce the glut and improve prices of the sweetener. Two, the Uttar Pradesh government (the state is home to a large number of private mills) has announced an incentive of Rs 40 on every quintal of sugarcane that the mills will buy from farmers in the sugar season that began early this month. And three, the Centre has exempted ethanol produced from molasses from central value added tax, which will raise sugar mills' realisation by Rs 5 a litre to Rs 47-48 a litre.
But the financials of the sector are still weak and the market may have moved ahead of the fundamentals. The current price of sugar is not enough for the mills to pay the sugarcane farmers fully and still report a profit. The mills may not make sustained profits in future quarters. In any case, the huge carryover losses from the past will take very long to wipe out. Sadly, there is still no sign of the systemic change that would make sugar a viable business proposition. The industry is a regulatory mishmash: while the price of the output (sugar) is decontrolled, that of the principal input (sugarcane) is controlled. Uttar Pradesh, every year, announces the price at which mills can buy sugarcane from farmers. For political reasons, it is very high - way beyond what the mills can pay, given the price of sugar. As a result, arrears to farmers are huge. The industry in the last few months has demanded steps that hark back to the days of the Licence Raj: minimum support price for sugar, accommodation from state-owned banks, monitored monthly release of sugar, and subsidy on cane purchases. But what the sector needs is not more intervention but more reform. A solution to this imbroglio exists, in the form of the suggestion by a C Rangarajan-led committee to link sugar and sugarcane prices. This requires placing the national interest above short-term politics.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
