Letters: Interference in PSBs

Image
Business Standard New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 15 2016 | 9:41 PM IST
Apropos "Robbing Peter" (February 13), taxpayer money is being used to bail public sector banks out of their turmoil caused by the piling up of bad loans. The writer has outlined only the pitfalls of Indian banks after their nationalisation. It is true that the turmoil in the public sector banks (PSBs) is alarming. However, it's not their employees or those of banking regulator Reserve Bank of India who are to be blamed for this. Rather, the policies and practices of the largest stakeholder in the banks - the government - are to be blamed, besides day-to-day interference in their functioning. Be it sanctioning or restructuring of loans to the high and mighty corporates or doling out subsidised loans to the masses in the form of political sops, from selection and appointments of chief executives in these banks to setting up of impractical and unviable targets for financial inclusion activities, government interference is omnipresent in PSBs and it has only become more pronounced.

In spite of all these shortcomings, Indian PSBs have stood the test of time, moving from "class banking to mass banking" and standing tall even in the midst of a global economic slowdown. Today, implementation of any social sector scheme by the government invariably involves the participation and contribution of banks. Be it opening lakhs of bank accounts of students, NREGA workers, Direct Benefit Transfer beneficiaries and pensioners or for crediting funds of scholarships and many others, the government has more trust in the practices and employees of banks than its own departments.

Why can't there be made a norm in every department and public sector undertaking, whereby government business is mandatorily given to any PSB? In all these PSBs, there are inter-zone, inter-branch (within zone) and inter-employee competitions (within a branch). There is a need to change the way the PSBs are manhandled by the political class because even placing private sector executives at the helm doesn't seem to have yielded any positive outcome as a result of unthinking interference to achieve political ends.

Sagar Soni Gandhinagar

Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to:
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
New Delhi 110 002
Fax: (011) 23720201
E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 15 2016 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story