The first challenge, of course, will be of financing. According to the plan, the Central and state governments will have an equal share of 39 per cent in capital expenditure, while 22 per cent is expected to come from the private sector. The government finances are stressed, both at the Centre and states, and attaining projected fiscal targets is becoming increasingly difficult. Since the government cannot touch its obligations such as interest payment and salaries, invariably, it is the capital expenditure that gets affected. For example, in its latest annual study of state government finances, the Reserve Bank of India has highlighted the decline in the quality of spending. Differently put, higher revenue expenditure is affecting capital expenditure. The upcoming Union Budget will bring in more clarity in terms of the Central government’s ability to finance infrastructure projects. Also, the assumption of a significant increase in economic growth in the coming years would be tested. In the absence of a significant pickup in economic activity and tax revenues, the government will find it difficult to fund projects. Further, since infrastructure projects tend to have long gestation and given the state of the Indian financial system, financing could also be a challenge for the private sector.
Second, the coordination between the central and state governments would be critical. While the Centre and state governments have so far shown outstanding coordination in the context of goods and services tax, such an alignment is not the norm. The given political situation and the fact that the Bharatiya Janata Party has lost power in several states will only make things difficult for the Union government. Third, the government will need to initiate a series of reforms to be able to attract the desired level of investment by the private sector. The ability to enforce contracts, for instance, remains a big challenge, as highlighted in the World Bank’s ease of doing business rankings. It is also important to note that India needs a mechanism to ensure that state governments do not cancel contracts randomly because of the change of the guard at the political level. The government will also need to ease restrictions on acquiring land and hiring labour, and will need to avoid the mistakes of the past and design public-private partnerships (PPPs) more transparently. The recent experience of PPPs and foreign investment has been somewhat disappointing, and the sorry state of corporate balance sheets makes it doubtful whether the private sector can put up its projected share in infrastructure investment. There have been suggestions to set up 100 per cent government-owned special purpose vehicles (SPV) that secure all permissions, licences, and clearances, as well as undertake land acquisition. The SPV is then bid out to private developers. It’s an idea worth considering.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)