AAP leader Raghav Chadha said that contrary to CEC Rawat's assertion in a newspaper interview that the AAP did not request the EC to hold hearings though it was served notices on September 28 and November 2 last year, the party did "respond twice".
"The CEC is lying. We wrote, 'yes, we want to place our side', both in written and oral. The EC didn't respond. How can you not give us a hearing?
In his defence, Rawat said that the "notice was comprehensive. But the AAP did not respond in the context of the notice."
"Since the matter is subjudice, let us not talk about it further," Rawat told PTI.
Chadha also dubbed as "illegal" Rawat's decision to involve himself in AAP-related cases after having recused himself in April 2017 when was the election commissioner. The AAP was in "complete dark" about this, he said.
The AAP's Rajya Sabha-elect Sanjay Singh alleged that the Commission's "unilateral action" was in violation of all norms and wondered if the President could not have shown the "minimum constitutional propriety" by meeting the MLAs before acting on the EC advice.
"MLAs of Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Bengal, Assam and Mizoram have not been disqualified despite their appointments being quashed by the high court.
Chadha also questioned the role of Election Commissioner Sunil Arora in the matter, claiming he was never involved in the case related to the AAP MLAs.
"We never even saw him and now he is one of the signatories to the document recommending the disqualification of the MLAs," he said.
20 AAP MLAs were disqualified last week on charge of holding office of profit. President Ram Nath Kovind gave his assent on January 20 to the recommendation in this regard by the Election Commission.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
