A Division Bench of Justice N Paul Vasanthakumar and Justice P Devadoss clarified the matter on a petition filed by one Karnataka based company, which approached the Court against orders passed by the NGT's Southern Bench.
In its order, the bench said "Section 29 of the NGT Actdeals with the bar of Jurisdiction of Civil Courts, and the Jurisdiction of High Court under article 226/227 is not ousted under the Act."
After the Court Registry doubted the very maintainabilityof the Karnataka firm's appeal in view of the statutory barin the NGT Act, the matter was brought to the notice of thebench, which said appeals could indeed be filed in High Court.
When Additional Solicitor-General of India G Masilamani sought to know whether appeal would lie in the Madras High Court or in the state from where the issue arose, the judges said parties had choice in the matter.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
