CAG was 'very kind' in assessing losses of coal blocks

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 19 2015 | 9:02 PM IST
CAG was "very kind" when it put losses incurred due to coal blocks allocation between 2006 and 2010 at Rs 1.86 lakh crore, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said tonight while highlighting that auction being undertaken by the present government had reaped much more revenue.
The NDA government did what former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh could not do in his tenure despite being "uncomfortable with the discretions being exercised" in coal blocks allocations, Jaitley said in Rajya Sabha while replying to the debate on General Budget.
"It was Dr Manmohan Singh, who within two months of taking over as Prime Minister, said coal blocks should be auctioned," he said.
After the scam in coal blocks allocation came to light, the Supreme Court had cancelled 204 such allotments.
Justifying the Modi government's decision to auction coal blocks and mines and bring new bills in this regard, Jaitley said effort was being made to "get rid of those discretions" and ensure that the "whole law is smoothened out".
He said auctions of just 33 blocks so far has fetched Rs 2.13 lakh crore to the government kitty, surpassing former CAG Vinod Rai's estimates of Rs 1.86 lakh crore losses to the state exchequer on account of allocations of 204 blocks without auctions.
"..Somebody in the earlier government who thought that these coal blocks and other resources were worth 'zero'... Now it appears that the CAG has been very kind when he estimated those losses. And today each one of these rupees will be going to the states," Jaitley said.
"At least the success of the coal block auction should convince you and convince the whole country...This policy serves the country well. Obstructionism transiently can be a tactic but can't be a permanent feature," he said urging the opposition not to stall the Coal and Mines bills.
He said the 2010 law, not implemented by the previous government, needed to be changed as it did not transfer the ownership rights on land and infrastructure to the bidder and hence there could be no takers for minerals below such land.
"The 2010 law which you did not implement.. Provides for an auction but surface land and infrastructure belongs to old operator. No body is going to come and claim the right on the mineral below. It needed to be updated to ensure that whoever bids defacto gets land and infrastructure and old owner will be compensated," he said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 19 2015 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story