A bench of justices S Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakhru today asked South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to come back with instructions on whether it can grant the certificate based on an undertaking by DDCA that it will ensure full compliance in three weeks.
The bench was of the view that "ultimately it is the safety of the stadium which will host the match, that is paramount".
"We should adhere to the highest standards," it said.
The court made the observations after advocate Sangram Patnaik, appearing for Delhi and Districts Cricket Association (DDCA), told the bench that today was the last date for informing BCCI whether the stadium can be fixed as a venue as tickets would be sold globally from tomorrow.
"If today is the last date, you should have done it (compliances) by now. If you don't have a stadium prepared, how can you sell tickets? If tickets are sold under court orders and later stadium is found to be unsafe, then what happens? Tell BCCI to wait," the courts said.
Patnaik claimed that 80 per cent of work had been
completed, but said even if it is 40 per cent then too SDMC can give the certificate on an undertaking that the entire work would be completed in three weeks.
He said an amount of Rs 50 lakh would also be paid to SDMC towards property tax dues.
Patnaik said that DDCA had lost out on hosting a India- Sri Lanka match at the stadium on February 12 as a no objection certificate (NOC) was not available from Land and Development Officer (L&DO) over payment of dues, when in fact L&DO had to refund Rs 83 lakh to it.
It has said it has been granted a NOC from L&DO for getting occupancy or completion certificate from SDMC.
The high court on November 18, 2015, while allowing DDCA to hold the India-South Africa test at Kotla, had directed it to obtain all clearances and NOCs from local authorities, including L&DO, by March 31 this year.
DDCA has also said that work was in progress regarding the corrections in deviations in the present structure of the stadium as pointed out by SDMC, and everything would be completed within three weeks.
Thereafter, prior to holding a match at the stadium, DDCA moves an application for a provisional occupancy certificate as it did not have a completion certificate from SDMC, for which an updated property tax return is also required, besides NOCs from various agencies.
As per SDMC, there was no provision under the law to issue a provisional occupancy certificate.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
