The ruling passed by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, China's rubber stamp parliament, said elected members to Legislative Council (LegCo) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) must swear allegiance to Hong Kong as part of China and those who changed their oath will be disqualified.
"When assuming office, the chief executive, principal officials, members of the executive council and of the legislative council, judges of courts at all levels and other members of the judiciary in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must, in accordance with law, swear to uphold the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
The clause stipulating "allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People' s Republic of China" is not only the legal content which must be included in the oath prescribed by the Article, but also the legal requirements and preconditions for standing for election in respect of or taking up the public office specified in the Article, the NPC ruling said.
This followed China facing major challenge to its political hold on the former British colony which was merged with the mainland in 1997 with certain privileges like freedom of expression which were not granted to Tibet and Xinjiang, though they are treated as Autonomous Regions for their distinct ethnic identities.
Two pro-independence legislators, Yau Wai-ching and Sixtus Leung, from Youngspiration party expressed support for Hong Kong's independence from China while taking oath in LegCo last month and used a derogatory term to describe Beijing.
China's ruling may also call into question oath of three other pro-independence legislators.
Yau Wai-ching created a stir by laying out a banner with the word "Hong Kong is not China" before taking her first oath.
Leung crossed his fingers while Yau used the F-word in her pledge.
Their actions followed by over a year anti-China protests and demonstrations in former British colony creating a piquant situation for Beijing over fears that an outright crackdown may alienate the SAR further.
Oath taking is the legal prerequisite and required
procedure for public officers specified in the Article to assume office.
Today's ruling by the NPC said no public office shall be assumed, no corresponding powers and functions shall be exercised, and no corresponding entitlements shall be enjoyed by anyone who fails to lawfully and validly take the oath or who declines to take the oath.
The ruling also barred people from tampering with the oath.
An oath taker is disqualified forthwith from assuming the public office specified in the Article if he or she declines to take the oath, the interpretation said.
As soon as the NPC passed the new interpretation, China backed Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying said that he and the SAR government will fully implement it.
Leung, who faced criticism for toeing Beijing's line told a press conference that as the chief executive of the SAR, he has the duty to implement the Basic Law in accordance with Article 48 of the Basic Law.
The Beijing's interpretation may be challenged in the Hong Kong courts who still uphold the freedoms when the British colony was handed over to China.
The terse ruling by China was expected to take control of the city whose 7.3 million population turned increasingly hostile to Beijing's attempts to firm up its control.
Three advocates of Hong Kong self-determination who have been sworn in as lawmakers say they are undeterred by Beijing's latest ruling, vowing to stay true to their election platforms and discuss the issue in the Legislative Council.
"It's not my own concern [about losing my seat] now. The whole society should be worried," she said about NPC's ruling.
Several Labour Party leaders of Hong Kong gathered in front of Beijing's liaison office to protest against the interpretation, the report said.
Cyd Ho Sau-lan, the party's vice-chairwoman, said the interpretation set a precedent for future justifications to disqualify and prosecute dissenting legislators.
"This interpretation has thoroughly destroyed our election system. Through requiring legislators to sincerely embrace the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Basic Law, [Beijing] can screen out candidates and bar people from entering Legco," she said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
