The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which is a body of various mobile operators including newcomer Reliance Jio, alleged in a statement that Trai's orders and regulations "seem to be strengthening the ambitions of one particular operator with deep pockets and monopolistic designs at the expense of other operators".
COAI, however, did not name Jio.
The association said that a majority of its members agreed with the assessment of Trai's regulations, except Reliance Jio which had a divergent view on the matter.
This had "destroyed" the financials of the industry with tens of thousands of jobs and tens of billions of dollars of investment at stake, it added.
"The COAI today expressed its deep disappointment and alarming concern regarding Trais tariff order amendment. For some reason these orders seem to be strengthening the ambitions of one particular operator with deep pockets and monopolistic designs at the expense of other operators," it said.
"An environment of regulation and policy that is not based on an equal footing will further aggravate the deep financial stress and kill future investments, innovation in an industry that has put India on the global map," Mathews added.
The COAI termed Trai's past regulations on call connect charges as "regressive" and went on to say that the regulator's recent amendment to Telecom Tariff Policy (that defined the nuances of predatory pricing) had dealt a "near fatal blow" to the industry.
The association also flagged the revised definition of Significant Market Power (SMP) that now excludes parameters like traffic volume and switching capacity, and said such changes will place older operators at a disadvantage and stop them from responding to "what may be actual predatory tariff plans".
"In a cruel twist of fate, one operator who by its own admission is the worlds largest data network may be free to offer any sort of predatory tariffs while older operators are now subject to regulation and cannot compete without falling foul of a new definition of what constitutes predatory pricing," it said.
"Even more strangely, they will find it practically difficult to offer any discounts/provide benefits to retain their customers if a competitor chose to poach them, effectively taking away their ability to compete and conduct business," the COAI said.
Last week, Trai said it will impose financial disincentive of up to Rs 50 lakh per circle on operators if their service rates are found to be predatory in nature.
The regulator had said it will determine "relevant market" based on relevant product against which it receives a complaint.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
