A bench headed by Justice R M Lodha directed the seven mining states--Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal --to file their response on four questions framed by it by October 29.
The court refused to pass any order to the companies allotted coal blocks to maintain status quo, stating this can be considered only after hearing them.
The apex asked the state governments to file their response on how they understand the issue of allocation. The Centre termed allocation by it as just an exercise of identification of blocks and at the most a letter of intent given to the companies by it.
They were also asked to clarify the role played by the state in allocation of coal blocks which is done by the Centre and its role in subsequent steps having regard to the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.
The court is scrutinising coal block allocation since 1993 on three PILs seeking cancellation of blocks on the ground that rules were flouted in giving away the natural resources and that certain companies were favoured in this process.
The bench also made it clear that the response must be filed by a Secretary-level officer.
Attorney General G E Vahanvati had yesterday submitted that coal blocks allocation is merely a letter of intent and does not confer any right to the companies over the natural resource which is decided by the state government.
"No right is created in favour of companies by allocating coal blocks. At the most it can be said that it is is letter of intent," the AG had said, adding that all procedure was followed in the allocations.
