Court acquits 2 persons accused of firing at police team

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 14 2015 | 11:42 AM IST
Two persons, accused of firing at a police team which apprehended them following a chase here in 2010, have been acquitted by a Delhi court as it noted that contradictions in the version of witnesses raise "serious doubts" over the incident.
Additional Sessions Judge Reetesh Singh acquitted Surjeet and Sonu Daggar, who were arrested by Special Cell of Delhi Police in November 2010. Two pistols were allegedly recovered from their possession.
"The lacunae coupled with the contradictions in the version of the prosecution witnesses... Cast serious doubts on their version. The benefit of such doubt will have to go in favour of the accused persons," the court said.
"The net result of above discussion is that prosecution has been unable to prove the charges framed against accused Surjeet and Sonu Daggar beyond reasonable doubt," it said.
According to police, Surjeet was awarded life term in a case and he had jumped parole while his associate Sonu was involved in a double murder case and attempt to murder cases.
They claimed that they had received a tip-off on November 15, 2010, that Surjeet, who was wanted in cases lodged in Delhi and Haryana, and Sonu would be coming here through Sindhu Border in a car.
It said that a police team was constituted and, after they spotted their car, they signalled to its driver to stop but he increased speed and the other person sitting in the vehicle allegedly fired at the police team.
The police officials also fired back to stop their car but the accused tried to flee from the spot near Narela and they stopped their vehicle and fired again at the cops.
It was claimed that both the accused were apprehended after a chase and two pistols were recovered from their possession.
During the trial, the counsel for the accused argued that the version of police regarding the manner in which his clients were apprehended and recoveries were effected from them was full of contradictions.
The counsel also said that police had not made any effort to trace the owner of the car in which the accused were allegedly travelling and weapons were planted on them.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 14 2015 | 11:42 AM IST

Next Story