The East District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum said the bill issued by DJB for commercial usage was "illegal" as the civic agency itself had admitted that the complainant's connection was for domestic purposes.
"In view of the overwhelming evidence available on record and admission of the opposite party (DJB) in their reply that the connection was for domestic purposes..., the bill issued on non-domestic basis was wholly illegal.
"We allow this complaint and direct opposite party to issue the correct bill as per the domestic tariff plan...," a bench presided by N A Zaidi said and directed DJB to pay Rs 10,000 as compensation to U K Aggarwal.
During the pendency of the proceedings, DJB told the forum that it has corrected the bill and the amount has been reduced to Rs 2,433.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
