Rape victims's friend rejects claims by 2 accused

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 13 2013 | 6:55 PM IST
Junking claims by two of the six accused in the sensational December 16 Delhi gangrape case, the 23-year-old victim's male friend today told a special court that both Mukesh and Vinay Sharma were in the bus when the incident took place.
During the cross examination of the victim's friend, the counsel for Mukesh contended before Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna that they were not involved in the gangrape and had neither beaten the youth nor had robbed them.
Vinay, another accused in the case, claimed that he was not in the bus that fateful night and was at a music function in South Delhi.
The victim's friend, a 28-year-old software engineer, refuted the contentions of Mukesh and Vinay, saying he had identified the bus and even the accused who were present in it that night.
"It is wrong to suggest that accused Mukesh was not sitting on the driver's seat when I entered the bus. I had already identified the accused who was sitting on the driver's seat at the time of my entering the bus.
"It is wrong to suggest that accused Vinay was not present inside the bus at the time of the incident," the victim's friend said.
Mukesh along with five others, including a juvenile, had allegedly gangraped a girl in a moving bus here on the night of December 16, 2012. The girl had later died of her injuries in a Singapore hospital on December 29.
During the proceedings, the counsel also claimed that Mukesh has nothing do with the present case and he was falsely implicated at the instance of Delhi police and also because he was the brother of the main accused Ram Singh, who was found dead in his prison cell on March 11.
The victim's friend, however, refuted Mukesh's contention and said, "It is wrong to suggest that Mukesh was shown to me by the police in the police station before Test Identification Parade (TIP) or for that reason I had identified him in the TIP...
"... Or that the photographs of accused Mukesh were shown prior to the TIP or that I had framed him because he is brother of accused Ram Singh (dead) or that he was framed at the instance of the police or that Mukesh was the only person among the accused person who knew driving.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 13 2013 | 6:55 PM IST

Next Story