The Sasikala Natarajan camp, which too has approached the EC seeking control over the party, will present its case before the poll panel on October 13.
The EPS-OPS camp told the Election Commission at a hearing, which lasted two hours, that Sasikala and her nephew T T V Dhinakaran, who was appointed deputy general secretary of the AIADMK by her, have been removed from the party and cannot stake claim over it or the 'two leaves' election symbol.
In an interim order in March this year, the Commission had barred the then rivals--Palaniswamy and Panneerselvam-- from using the party's name or its election symbol in the R K Nagar assembly bypoll necessitated due to demise of Jayalalithaa.
The bypoll, for which the AIADMK had fielded Dhinakaran, was later cancelled due to alleged bribing of voters and is yet to take place.
"All the members of the AIADMK have buried the hatchet and now only Dhinakaran, who claims to have only 18 disqualified MLAs, is on the other side," Rohatgi told reporters after the hearing.
The Supreme Court today directed the Election Commission to decide by November 10 the claim of rival factions over the AIADMK's election symbol and allowed it to proceed with the scheduled hearing in the case.
One of Dhinakaran's counsel N Raja Senthoor Pandian told reporters that the Sasikala camp demanded cross-examination of those who had filed fresh affidavits in support of the EPS-OPS camp.
He said the EC accepted to hear the arguments of the Sasikala camp on October 13. He said the cross-examination would be the main issue the Commission would hear next Friday.
Prior to the merger, the two faction led by Panneerselvam and V K Sasikala had staked claim over the symbol. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Palaniswamy was then a Sasikala loyalist.
The poll panel had, however, frozen the symbol, pending decision on their pleas.
Later, a large number of legislators led by Palaniswami revolted against Sasikala, who is in jail in a disproportionate assets case, and announced merger of the two factions.
On September 14, representatives of Dhinakaran had approached the EC urging it to declare as invalid the general council meeting, citing a high court order that said any decision taken at the impugned meeting will be subject to the final outcome in the appeal.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
