The government is re-examining the bids for nine coal blocks, including those where Jindal Steel and Power Ltd and Balco emerged as the top bidders, and a final decision on their fate it yet to be taken amid speculation of cartelisation during their bidding process.
"Assocham has urged the government to expeditiously notify these as successful bidders (and) enter into Coal Mining Development and Production Agreement (CMDPA) and issue vesting orders to achieve the dual objectives of coal ordinance i.E. Continuity of coal mining operations and optimum utilisation of natural resources," the industry chamber said a statement.
Subdued interest in some coal blocks leading to their subsequent withdrawal from auction process is an indicator of relative utility of a particular coal block, it added.
"Decision to re-examine bid prices through prism of trend set by 'unexpectedly high bids' should be reviewed," Assocham secretary general D S Rawat said.
He added that characteristics of each coal block varies and bidding would have been dependent on factors unique to the particular coal block like peak rated capacity, gross calorific value of coal, extractable reserves, mining cost and most importantly logistics to transport the coal to end use plant of bidders from coal mine.
In the cases of coal blocks auctioned for power sector, the industry body highlighted that power producers would not only forego the mining cost which is included as energy charge in power purchase agreements but have also quoted additional premium which will go to the state governments and will have to be borne by the bidder.
This implies that in energy charge component of the power tariff, the coal cost would be absorbed by the company which will translate into downward revision of tariff in existing power purchase agreements (PPAs), Assocham said.
