HC asks Tihar to show papers of Tandoor case convict's release

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 07 2017 | 8:28 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Delhi High Court today asked the Tihar jail authorities to produce the minutes of meeting of the Sentence Review Board in which former Congress youth leader Sushil Kumar Sharma's plea for premature release was taken up for consideration.
Justice Ashutosh Kumar issued the direction on Sharma's plea, who is serving life imprisonment for murdering his wife Naina Sahni and throwing her body in a restaurant's tandoor here.
The court also sought the convict's latest nominal roll from the Tihar Jail Superintendent.
Sharma's counsel Sumeet Verma and Amit Sahni moved the court for premature release, claiming that their client has spent over 25 years in jail, which is the maximum prescribed punishment as per the Sentence Review Board guidelines.
The counsel submitted that the years also include four years in remission earned over the period of imprisonment.
They also sought parole till the time the Board decided his plea for premature release.
Taking note of this, the court asked the authorities to produce the details of Board's proceedings held recently.
It was of the view that there should not be a "pick and choose" criteria.
In September 2015, twenty years after he was sent to jail for the murder of his wife, Sharma was released on unconditional parole till a final decision on his release was taken.
Now 56, Sharma had shot his wife Naina Sahni to death in 1995 objecting to her alleged relationship with a male friend. He had then chopped her body into pieces and attempted to burn it in a restaurant's oven.
Popularly known as the tandoor murder case, it is one of the landmark cases in India in which DNA evidence and a second autopsy were used to establish the guilt of the accused.
The convict's counsel told the court that a Supreme Court bench in 2013 had commuted the death penalty awarded to Sharma to life imprisonment and held that the crime committed by Sharma was "not a crime against society" but a murder arising out of a "strained personal relationship".
The top court had also held that there was a possibility of Sharma's rehabilitation, the counsel said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 07 2017 | 8:28 PM IST

Next Story