Justice P Ubaid gave this direction while considering the state government's plea seeking an "urgent" hearing of a revision petition filed against a CBI court verdict acquitting Vijayan in the graft case.
The court said that even if much older revision petitions and appeals are pending consideration, being a matter of public importance, government's request needs consideration.
Though counsel for accused, including Vijayan, pointed out that the state has no right to file such a petition and is 'politically motivated', the Court permitted hearing of the case by last week of February, 2016.
Counsel for the accused also pointed out that it was Asaf Ali who had filed a PIL seeking a CBI probe into the graft case before he assumed office of the DGP.
CBI did not take a definite stand on early hearing of revision petition.
The revision plea challenging discharge of Vijayan and six others in the SNC Lavalin graft case was originally filed by one T P Nandakumar and CBI which had filed charge sheet in the case.
The CBI special court in Thiruvananthapuram had in November 2013 discharged Vijayan and six others from the Rs 374.50 crore graft case.
The special judge had ruled that CBI had failed to prove the charges of conspiracy and corruption levelled against Vijayan and other accused.
The special court had stated that CBI had failed to establish the fraudulent intention, abuse of official position, criminal conspiracy and element of cheating in connection with the award of contract to Canadian firm SNC Lavalin for renovating three hydel projects in Kerala.
"The losses suffered by the state of Kerala and Kerala State Electricity Board are very high. Procrastination tactics adopted by the accused in the case is to be viewed seriously. There is no justification in delaying the hearing of the case on one pretext or other. Hence the matter is urgent in nature," it had said.
