Petitioner V Ashokan, Founder of non-government organisation Nature Care Trust, contended that the order was a violation of the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972 and also against the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court for declaring a zone as Eco-sensitive zone.
He submitted Kodaikanal Hill had 16 villages where six lakh people lived. It was also a hill station. The People of the villages were dependent only on agriculture.Their livelihood would be affected by the declaration of the government.
The Bharathia Kissan sangam had given a representation opposing the declaration on Jan 6 last. The petitioner had also given a representation on Jan 12. But there was no response from the Government.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
