Passing interim orders on a PIL, a division bench headed by Justice P N Ravindran said prima facie there was some infirmity in the January 27 government order. Petitioner Indian Association of Lawyers submitted that though the Chief Minister had declared that the order exempting VACB from the purview of RTI will be revoked before the model code of conduct for the May 16 Assembly came into force, so far nothing in this regard had been done by the government.
Noting that RTI Act allowed exemption of only intelligence and security organisations from its purview, the PIL alleged the state government issued the order to cover up large-scale corruption committed by ministers and higher officials.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
