Petitioner's counsel C B Pandey alleged that the scheme was "discriminatory" as choosing only a village in any district and leaving the rest was not permissible under the law.
The Lucknow bench of the High Court, comprising Justices Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Mahendra Dayal, gave three weeks to the Central and state governments to respond to the petition filed by Lucknow-based Naitik Party.
A preliminary objection was raised on behalf of the UP government that a political party cannot file a PIL, hence it was liable to be dismissed.
Centre's counsel Alok Mathur, who had appeared in the court, has said that the court has given three weeks to file a reply in the case.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
