The agency had recently dispatched a clarification countering 12 apparent holes that the ministry had picked in its plea seeking sanction to prosecute Kumar.
The ministry had asked some pointed questions related to the CBI's theory of weapons being planted on the victims, testimony of witnesses and identity of those involved, among others.
It had also sought an explanation from the agency on its position regarding the chief of Ahmedabad police in the case.
The ministry and CBI have locked horns over the issues as the latter has refused to share the details of the case.
While IB, which comes under MHA, holds that the encounter -- in which Ishrat Jahan was killed along with three others by Gujarat crime branch personnel in Ahmedabad in June, 2004 -- was a genuine counter-terror operation, CBI believes otherwise.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
